Sales Proposal
14 June 2026
Accessibility audit & remediation — a one-time fix, continuously enforced.
A formal proposal to bring your digital product to WCAG 2.2 Level AA conformance, produce a procurement-ready IAAP-format Accessibility Conformance Report, and lock in continuous compliance with CI-integrated regression checks. Defensible in court. Accepted by procurement. Built on AI-led auditing plus human pair-review.
Hours, not weeks
First report in 1 to 4 hours of wall-clock time.
Procurement-grade
IAAP ACR / VPAT 2.5 INT, the format buyers actually accept.
Defensible
Per-finding evidence pack with screen-reader transcripts.
Executive summary
The bottom line.
More than 4,600 ADA Title III website lawsuits were filed in 2023 alone, and the EU Accessibility Act took effect across all EU member states in 2025. Both regulators have explicitly rejected accessibility “overlay” widgets as a substitute for actually-accessible code.
AccessivePath replaces the overlay band-aid with a real fix. Our AI auditor produces a procurement-grade IAAP-format report in hours, our accessibility engineers ship the source-level remediations, and our CI integration locks regressions out of every future deploy.
Most clients close stages 1 to 4 in 4 to 8 weeks. We size the engagement to your actual scope: number of properties, page count, regulatory regime (ADA, EAA, Section 508), and whether you want hands-on remediation or pair-review only. A scoping call returns a fixed quote in 24 hours.
The problem
Why this is now urgent.
4,605
ADA Title III website lawsuits filed in 2023 (Seyfarth Shaw tracker).
1 in 4
Of those sites were running an accessibility overlay when sued.
€100K
Maximum per-breach fine under the EU Accessibility Act, in force from 2025.
96%
Of homepages on the web fail at least one WCAG criterion (WebAIM 2024).
15%
Average conversion drop on inaccessible e-commerce flows (Forrester).
285M
Visually impaired people worldwide who use screen readers (WHO).
Our solution
A four-stage programme.
End-to-end. You hand over a URL, we hand back a defensible accessibility programme.
- 01
End-to-end audit
1 to 4 hours
AI auditor + IAAP ACR + evidence pack.
- 02
Consultation
1 to 2 days
Walk-through with your team, prioritised roadmap.
- 03
Remediation
2 to 6 weeks
Source-level fixes, design-system patches, pair-review.
- 04
Compliance-ready
Ongoing
Re-audit, accessibility statement, CI regression checks.
Pricing
Tailored to your scope. Get in touch.
We do not sell shelf SKUs. Every engagement is sized to your actual surface area: number of digital properties, page count, regulatory regime (ADA, EAA, Section 508, EN 301 549), and whether you want our engineers to ship the fixes or pair-review yours. A 20-minute scoping call returns a fixed quote within 24 hours.
What a scoping call covers
- Your products, properties, and current accessibility posture
- Regulatory exposure (ADA, EAA, Section 508, AODA, RGAA)
- Deadlines: procurement RFPs, EAA cut-off, lawsuit response
- Engineering capacity and whether you want hands-on remediation
- Tech stack: React, Vue, Angular, native iOS / Android, design system
- Final deliverable preference: IAAP ACR, VPAT 2.5 INT, or both
Most quotes for a single web property land between $5,000 and $20,000 one-time. Larger programmes and multi-product portfolios run on annual retainer. We will be transparent on the call about what your scope realistically costs.
ROI
What does not doing this cost you?
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Average ADA Title III settlement (US, 2023) | $25,000 to $75,000 |
| Average defence cost even if you win | $50,000 to $150,000 |
| EU EAA non-compliance fine ceiling (per breach) | Up to €100,000 |
| Lost-customer cost (15% conversion drop on inaccessible site) | 6-figure annual revenue, per WebAIM |
One avoided ADA settlement covers the cost of an end-to-end audit and remediation programme several times over. One EAA fine covers it many times more. We have not seen a CFO who could not justify the spend on the second slide.
Comparison
Versus an accessibility-overlay vendor.
accessiBe. UserWay. AudioEye. EqualWeb. Their pitch is one line of JavaScript and instant ADA compliance. The DOJ, the W3C, the courts, and the visually impaired user community have all reached the same conclusion: overlays do not work.
| Dimension | Overlay vendor | AccessivePath |
|---|---|---|
| Fix approach | JavaScript widget bolted on top | Real HTML fixes at the source |
| WCAG conformance | No, by their own admission | WCAG 2.2 Level AA, documented |
| Legal protection | None — sites still get sued routinely | IAAP ACR / VPAT, accepted as evidence |
| Screen-reader UX | Frequently worse; users disable them | Better; tested with real NVDA / VoiceOver |
| Annual cost | $490 to $5,000+ per year, forever | One-time, then continuous CI for free |
| Defensible in court | No (DOJ March 2022) | Yes (procurement-grade, dated, signed) |
Next step
Three ways to start, this week.
Fastest, no commitment
Run free audit
Submit one URL. Get the first three findings inline in 60 seconds, full IAAP report by email in 4 hours.
For decision-makers
20-minute walkthrough
Live demo of the audit + ACR for your domain. With our founders. No sales motion.
For procurement
Formal SOW
Reply to this proposal. We will return a counter-signed SOW within 2 business days and kick off the audit the day after.